Monthly Archives: March 2016

Board of Selectmen Opposes Lexington Ban!

siren

In case you missed the meeting tonight, the Board of Selectmen, with an assist from Chief Corr, unanimously opposed amending the town’s by-laws to accommodate Mr. Rotberg’s proposed ban.

Moreover, on the option of replacing the by-law change with a non-binding resolution urging legislative action on behalf of the Massachusetts General Court, the Selectmen were lukewarm to negative as well.

This is nearly as good an outcome as we could have hoped tonight. It remains to be seen, however, how Mr. Rotberg will respond to the Board’s feedback.  He may elect to postpone indefinitely  his citizen’s article (as some on the board urged) or he may choose to force a vote in Town Meeting nonetheless.  Should Article 34 survive in any form in the Town Meeting, we must oppose it there as well.

More details to come, of course.  But in the meantime, we should feel very happy with tonight’s outcome.  A heartfelt “thank you” to all the brave Lexington patriots who spoke out against this measure tonight, as well as to all of those who have worked tirelessly for months in defense of our Constitutional liberties.   The war is not over, but a significant battle has been won tonight. Whatever the future holds, tonight was a very good night, and it is because of you.  Thank you.

Board of Selectmen’s Meeting, Tuesday, March 8!

The Board of Selectmen will be meeting Tuesday evening, March 8 to discuss the language of the all-important draft motion behind Article 34. This meeting is open to the public, and all concerned are encouraged to attend. There will be opportunity for public comments (see the agenda for details.) Attendees should, of course, be courteous and respectful, particularly since the Board of Selectmen has given us no reason to believe they are our adversaries on this issue.

The meeting will be held at Estabrook Hall, Cary Memorial Building at 6:30 PM. The topic of Article 34 is tentatively scheduled for discussion at around 8 PM.
Please attend if you can. See you there.

Wednesday, April 6, 2016!

Friends, this is it!  We now have a “date certain” on which Article 34 will come up for discussion in Lexington Town Meeting:  Wednesday, April 6, 2016.  Mark your calendars, and watch this space for further news.  If you haven’t yet done so, please sign up for our contact list, so we can keep you up to date with news, events, alerts and other breaking information as soon as we have it.

UPDATE:   Per Police Chief Corr, no firearms will be allowed on April 6, and attendees will be screened accordingly.  Please come unarmed.

Constitutional Concerns Regarding Article 34

The proponent of Article 34 stated that because the Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to the Highland Park case, that there would be no issue regarding its compliance with the 2nd Amendment.  At the time of the Supreme Court’s inaction on Highland Park, there were no conflicting lower court rulings.  Subsequently, in Kolbe v Maryland, the 4th Circuit applied “strict scrutiny” to Maryland’s assault weapons ban, found that the firearms in question were in “common use” and referred the case back to district court.  So the 2nd Amendment issue is very much alive, as we now have conflicting lower court cases that may soon require the Supreme Court to adjudicate.

Article 34 holds that “Any weapons or magazines deemed illegal in accord with this amended by-law within the Town of Lexington shall be seized and destroyed by the police of the Town of Lexington.” The Fourth Amendment holds that:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

If Lexington seizes firearms without a warrant, that would appear to be a 4th Amendment violation. And if it seeks a warrant, on what basis would a Massachusetts judge issue one, seeing that the firearms are legal under Massachusetts law?

Regarding the 5th amendment, it holds that:

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Article 34 would deprive firearms owners of their property with no due process.  The police, in their sole judgement, would deem a firearm non-compliant and seize it. This would appear to be a violation of the 5th Amendment.

Lexington has many real issues facing it.  Does the town really want to be distracted by, and squandering resources on, constitutional challenges to a by-law that even its proponent concedes is symbolic?